©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) fin

18/03/2015 16:30 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  fin

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) fin

    18/03/2015 16:30 par tellurikwaves

Distinctions et récompenses

Showing all 17 wins and 11 nominations

Academy Awards, USA 1979

 

Won
Oscar
Best Actor in a Leading Role
Jon Voight
Best Actress in a Leading Role
Jane Fonda
Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen
Nancy Dowd (story)
Waldo Salt (screenplay)
Robert C. Jones (screenplay)
Nominated
Oscar
Best Picture
Jerome Hellman
Best Actor in a Supporting Role
Bruce Dern
Best Actress in a Supporting Role
Penelope Milford
Best Director
Hal Ashby
Best Film Editing
Don Zimmerman


Golden Globes, USA 1979

 

Won
Golden Globe
Best Motion Picture Actor - Drama
Jon Voight
Best Motion Picture Actress - Drama
Jane Fonda
Nominated
Golden Globe
Best Motion Picture - Drama
Best Director - Motion Picture
Hal Ashby
Best Motion Picture Actor in a Supporting Role
Bruce Dern
Best Screenplay - Motion Picture
Waldo Salt
Robert C. Jones


Cannes Film Festival 1978

 

Won
Best Actor
Jon Voight
Nominated
Palme d'Or
Hal Ashby


Directors Guild of America, USA 1979

 

Nominated
DGA Award
Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Motion Pictures
Hal Ashby


Guild of German Art House Cinemas 1980

 

Won
Guild Film Award - Gold
Foreign Film (Ausländischer Film)
Hal Ashby


Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards 1978

 

Won
LAFCA Award
Best Picture
Best Actor
Jon Voight
Best Actress
Jane Fonda
For Comes a Horseman and California Suite


National Board of Review, USA 1978

 

Won
NBR Award
Best Actor
Jon Voight
Top Ten Films


National Society of Film Critics Awards, USA 1979

 

2nd place
NSFC Award
Best Actress
Jane Fonda
For Comes a Horseman and California Suite
Best Actor
Jon Voight


New York Film Critics Circle Awards 1978

 

Won
NYFCC Award
Best Actor
Jon Voight
3rd place
NYFCC Award
Best Actress
Jane Fonda


Writers Guild of America, USA 1979

 

Won
WGA Award (Screen)
Best Drama Written Directly for the Screen
Waldo Salt
Robert C. Jones

 

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p21

18/03/2015 16:24 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p21

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p21

    18/03/2015 16:24 par tellurikwaves

Trivia

Showing all 11 items
Jump to: Cameo (1) | Director Cameo (1) | Spoilers (1)
*
The opening scene where the vets in the hospital are talking was totally unscripted. They were real Vietnam vets discussing their own views about the war. Jon Voight was supposed to have added to the dialog, but out of respect stayed silent and listened.
*
One of the first films even partially dealing openly with the idea of sex between an able-bodied person and a disabled one. Other films dealing with disability and romance had indirectly implied it or avoided it altogether (such as in Les plus belles années de notre vie (1946)).
*
Sylvester Stallone, Jack Nicholson and Al Pacino declined the role that went to Jon Voight
*
Jane Fonda had wanted John Schlesinger to direct, but he declined as he felt that the Vietnam experience should be filmed by an American director.
*
Jon Voight's role of Luke Martin was loosely inspired by paralyzed Vietnam veteran Ron Kovic, who was making inroads in Hollywood with his book "Born on the Fourth of July" at the time. Of course, Kovic's book and story was in 1989 put on the screen with Tom Cruise in the role of Kovic.
*
The role of Luke Martin was originally offered to Sylvester Stallone.
*
Jane Fonda wanted Meryl Streep for the role of Vi but Streep had already signed up to appear in a play.
*
This film was one of two 1978 movies that actress Jane Fonda starred in in 1978 that had similar titles. The pictures were Le retour (1978) and Le souffle de la tempête (1978).
*

Cameo 

Haskell Wexler:  the DP appears as the general during Captain Hyde's medal ceremony.
*

Director Cameo 

Hal Ashby:  a passenger in a convertible sports car passing the one Jane Fonda is driving. He flashes the peace sign at her just as he passes.
*

Spoilers 

The trivia item below may give away important plot points.

Jane Fonda had a body double for her sex scene with Jon Voight.

 

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p19

18/03/2015 16:12 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p19

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p19

    18/03/2015 16:12 par tellurikwaves

 

Index 66 reviews in total 

 

*
*

Drop the "Hanoi Jane" ban, and see this film

10/10
Author: Canino-4 from Roseville, Ca
9 November 1999

Obviously any film about Viet Nam that stars Jane Fonda and Jon Voight is going to cause more than a few knees to jerk. Fondas embracing the enemy and Voights devout pacifism have both been well-documented, so there's no need to elaborate. Don't let this cause you to avoid this film. Many veterans were on hand for the filming, and they saw that they were taking part in something special. If they can draw a truce with Fonda, than you can as well. The opening scene sets a tone for the film that it never veers from. A group of disabled vets play pool, and directly confront each other over why they were there, and what it all means. Director Hal Ashby (RIP) pulls no punches here. These vets aren't scholars debating on MacNeil-Lehrer. They struggle with these questions. They don't have the fancy initials after their names that impress people so much. There just the real people that fought the war.

The rest of the film follows on this point. Special care goes into each character.Voights Luke Martin went to war to impress girls and feed his titanic ego. Because Ashby and his writers (Waldo Salt, Robert C. Jones and Nancy Dowd) didn't back off on showing Luke's bad side, it makes his transformation. He becomes a better person, because he develops the strength to look inside himself.

Bruce Dern gives an excellent performance, as well, in what is probably the trickiest part. Derns Bob Hyde is GI all the way, but returns from his first combat detail in a state of turmoil. He sees the insanity first hand and, quite frankly, can't handle it. The nice thing here is that he's not simply disillusioned by the politics of the war, but more by war, itself. It's to this films credit, that they didn't have Dern return home and do an about face and start protesting. That story has been told. Instead, once again, we see a human being struggling to understand things that may be unknowable. What makes a man cut another man's ears off, and throw them in his knapsack? How are you supposed to feel, when your fellow soldiers are boiling the flesh off a human skull, so they can mount it on a stake?

Oddly enough, Fondas character, Sally Hyde, may be the least "political" character in the film. Sure, she sees injustices at the VA hospital and gets involved volunteering, but this is merely as a novice. She asks very rudimentary questions about why the vets are being ignored, but she asks as a sympathetic human being, not an activist. As she eventually expands her horizons, she changes from an officer's wife into a more mature woman. As this happens, she falls in love with Voight. Neither person really wants it to happen. Voight doesn't want to betray a fellow soldier. Fonda doesn't want to betray her loyal husband. No easy answer.

It's a shame that "Coming Home" occupies such a small niche in film history. It's a quiet, thoughtful film that patiently tells its story. It doesn't have a single battle scene, but it remains incredibly powerful. Robert Carradines breakdown while he plays his guitar and sings, is a scene that should be taught in film school. Just one moment in an incredible film.Don't let this gem fade away.

*

strong without forcing it
10/10
Author: Movie_Man 500 from La La Land
2 June 2005

Without a single scene of combat footage, this story manages to convey, in realistically painful terms, how much Vietnam scarred the landscape of America. And this is only a fictional viewpoint. The true life accounts must be gut wrenching. No one returned from the war the same person. To suggest a film be made showing an unaffected soldier would be incredibley unbelievable. When attitudes change and characters grow from harsh realities, you can't help but be caught up in their struggle. People you would never expect to protest a US -involved conflict, or even question it, did so with Vietnam.

The Jane Fonda Sally character is such a person. She begins the picture somewhat naive, easily trusting, and sort of tied to her straight laced military existence as the wife of an enlisted man. But then she sees an entirely different world when he's gone, and over months, falls for his total opposite, symbolizing how much she can never go back to the woman she was at the beginning. It's very subtle and deeply felt acting that can achieve this and both Fonda and Voight deserved their Oscars for their moving and expert performances. Bruce Dern is the hardest to sympathsize with on the surface, but you realize he's been scarred by what he's seen too, and what has happened to him in his absence, so his world becomes more bitter as everything he once knew shatters around him.

The 3 experiences, his, Voight's and Fonda's merge together at the end, in a series of heartbreaking realizations, until you're left as broken as the country was after the war. You can't NOT be affected by what happened in Nam. It's impossible. And this film clearly shows why. It's the most personal and touching of Hollywood's Vietnam treatments. And certainly the deepest acted. Buy a copy and judge for yourself...

* 

An important film.

Author: Doctor_Bombay from Lucas Buck, NC
19 April 1999

This film, the `other' 1978 movie about the Vietnam War, `Coming Home' takes a different approach than Michael Cimino's stark, shocking, `The Deer Hunter', which won a Best Picture Oscar.Cimino used a power approach to deliver his message, drumming the filmgoer with sounds and images. Hal Ashby's `Coming Home' uses a more subdued, character approach to explore the real price of the Vietnam War.I'm not so sure I'd agree that either Jon Voight (Academy Award-Best Actor) or Jane Fonda (Academy Award-Best Actress) is exemplary (they both won Academy Awards) but I think they are both very good.

The bottom line is that this was an important movie, at a critical time, and the subject matter and its presentation really hit home. This is a film that is impossible to ignore, in 1978, or today, no matter what your political or social sensibilities may be. The language, the attitudes of all the characters is open, honest, frank. At the time this film was made, that was indeed breakthrough, for this subject matter, paramount.An absolute must see.

*

A thought-provoking sensitive movie with poignant moments…
8/10
Author: Righty-Sock (robertfrangie@hotmail.com) from Mexico
5 January 2009

Hal Ashby's film shares many of the characteristics of the other big Vietnam film of 1978, "The Deer Hunter." Both are passionate and essentially incoherent in their view of the war… As Ashby and screenplay writers see it, most American soldiers who experienced the war came back mentally and/or physically ravaged…

An introductory pool table conversation among several disabled vets establishes the ground rules… Anyone who defends the war for any reason is wrong… Cut to enthusiastic Marine Capt. Bob Hyde (Bruce Dern) and his naive wife Sally (Jane Fonda) in the Officer's Club…It is 1968…A military campaign conducted by forces of the Viet Cong has just started and Capt. Hyde is looking forward to his tour of duty in Vietnam... As a dedicated military officer, he sees it primarily as an opportunity for progress…

 As soon as he leaves, Sally is forced to find housing off the base and moves into a new apartment by the beach with another Marine wife—the bohemian Vi Munson (Penelope Milford), whose traumatized brother Bill (Robert Carradine) is a patient at the local Veteran's Hospital…Physically, Bill is fine, but "they sent him back without an ignition," Vi says… Lonely and looking for something to do, Sally volunteers at the hospital and runs across embittered cripple Luke Martin (Jon Voight). They soon discover that they went to the same high school, where he was the star quarterback and she was a cheerleader…

Now, paralyzed from the waist down Luke is subject to furious, self-pitying rages, understandable but still unpleasant and offensive… Sally externalizes his troubles, his scars, and his frustrations…And through Luke's eyes, Sally's absolute outlook on life starts to change… They soon become fairly close turning their friendship into a torrid affair… At the same time, Sally's husband was away discovering the horrors of the war…There was a particular chemistry between Fonda and Voight which gave the film a certain magic…

*

Probably the 2nd best Vietnam War movie behind "Apocalypse Now" (and certainly Hal Ashby's best movie ever).
10/10
Author: Lee Eisenberg (lee.eisenberg.pdx@gmail.com) from Portland, Oregon, USA
13 July 2005

"Coming Home" was the first Vietnam War movie that dealt with the soldiers' plight sympathetically. Sally Hyde (Jane Fonda) is volunteering at the Veterans' Hospital in Los Angeles while her husband Bob (Bruce Dern) serves in Vietnam. In the process of working in the hospital, Sally sees how the hospital is unprepared to treat the people who are coming back from the war. When paraplegic veteran Luke Martin (Jon Voight) demands better treatment, rather than listen to him, they tranquilize him so that they won't have to deal with him.

Over time, Sally and Luke fall in love. When Bob returns from Vietnam, he is completely damaged emotionally. The final scene shows the overall state of the world as a result of the Vietnam War.Whenever I hear the Rolling Stones' song "Out of Time", it reminds me of "Coming Home". One thing that you get to see in the movie is how, when Sally and Bob are having sex, she is clearly not enjoying it; when Sally and Luke are having sex, she clearly is enjoying it. Fonda and Voight won well-deserved Oscars for their roles, and if you ask me, the movie should have won Best Picture. A solid masterpiece.

* 

Good film, but the Dern character has problems

Author: (dnegri1@earthlink.net) from Pacifica, Ca
26 December 2000

I agree with most of the comments about the overall quality of the film. It was definitely a teamwork political statement. The soundtrack is stunning,not only in the selection of songs from the period - by far the best film in this respect - but the subtle manner in which they are integrated into the film's soundtrack. The acting is good to excellent - Fonda, Voigt and Carradine in particular.

However, my one complaint is with the Dern character. In this I speak from some personal experience, as a vet with a tour of duty in Nam. This may be quibbling, but...perhaps his contract had a clause prohibiting cutting his hair, but the locks (for a Marine captain) are much too long. He would have received a direct order to get them cut . Also, the close relationship between Dern and the sergeant is out of character. Marine Corps Captains did not hang out with E5 enlisted men. This is even more blatant in the scene after Dern's return from Nam when he goes out drinking and brings home three enlisted Marines.

A Marine Corps Captain would not be drinking in uniform with enlisted men on or near the base - let alone bringing them home. I won't go into the problems I have with Dern's apparent and largely unexplained repulsion at what his men did in the field. However, Dern aside, the film itself has a very authentic feel to it and there are unforgettable scenes such as those in the VA hospital and Voigt's final speech to high school students as Tim Buckley's haunting "One I Was" can be heard in the background. In many respects this film is the direct antithesis of Kubrick's "Full Metal Jacket", which while visually authentic suffers from a lack of emotion.

*

Timely and excellent portraits of two veteran soldiers of Viet Nam returning as changed men, confused and disillusioned, to a woman they each love and a U.S. they can no longer reconcile with the pre-war ima

Author: goddessblissninny from New York, NY
30 May 2004

Sadly and surprisingly relevant, "Coming Home" offers the perspective of one man who's war experience renders him not only paralyzed but unable to deny his own real life experience as a wartime soldier to the extent that he can continue supporting his government's patriotic dogma that one man should kill, torture or oppress other soldiers, men, women and children to defend motives he now views, from a wheelchair, as questionable. Awakening to this perspective is a woman who, attempting to aid the war effort and make herself useful during her husband's time of military service to his country, volunteers her time at the local Veteran's Hospital.

As she encounters the soldiers just returned battle with countless physical and psychological wounds too deep to enable their return to duty, she begins to understand the impossibility of their task to "get back to a normal life" and starts a longer journey out from under her own unquestioning acceptance of obeying principles that manufacture circumstances that make the peaceful pursuits of love and family inconceivable.

Her own husband does return to her, an officer who spent his tour of duty doing what he has accepted all of his life is the "right thing" for his country but he, too, is terribly damaged by what he has seen. When he discovers that he has returned to a wife that has broken both the sanctity of their marriage and the very foundation of their commonality as people - namely, upholding the belief that you must endure and inflict and perpetuate the tortures of Hell, itself, if your government demands it of you - he is unable to find a way forward in his life. As the last institutions that served as the structure of his sanity and happiness are wrenched out from under him, he faces a void too horrible to walk into and turns to the only way out that he can perceive.

This film is shot in what seems a sincere approach to relating the stories that were, immediately post-viet nam, being widely reported of and experienced by those U.S. men and women returning from service. It attempts, via narrative, to correlate them to the cultural experiences of the public. It seems to try to offer insight into the collective trauma inflicted by the very idea that war, as an institutional means of problem solving, is an acceptable and patriotic belief that merits the sacrifice of our lives and sanity.Though the film definitely has its own perspective, it maintains respect for each of the characters represented. It remains the imperative of each viewer to decide the question for themselves.

*

a movie definitively worth watching!!!
Author: Maria C from Vigo, Spain
1 June 2003

This is not another Vietnam movie.It does deal with the Vietnam war, but here we see how it affects the lives of two people: a disabled veteran and a woman he meets while recovering, whose husband is away fighting. These two characters make an emotional journey told in a intimate but resonating way.Well written (it won Best Original Screenplay) and superbly acted (the two leads, Jon Voight and Jane Fonda won the Academy Award, but the supporting cast is also terrific), this movie also has a wonderful soundtrack to match, including classics such as Buffalo Springfield's "For What It's Worth", "Hey Jude" or "Strawberry Fields Forever".One of the best movies from one of the best decades in American cinema.

*

Even more poignant now
10/10
Author: delphine090 from United States
9 June 2005

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I'd seen this movie a couple of times, the first time in the theater when it came out.At that time, it seemed we'd learned a lesson about war. Viet Nam was over.So watching it again last night was even more poignant - did we really learn anything, back then? I don't think this is a heavily politicized movie, although it doesn't really show any positive effects of war, doesn't say anything positive about fighting in Viet Nam. How could it, really? They had the recruiter speaking at the high school, about duty and honor and serving the country, all true. But could he say, about Viet Nam, that we "won" or "freed" anyone?So showing an unflinching catalog of the aftermath of battle becomes anti-war, simply because war is horrible. Very little dialog is devoted to telling us war is wrong. We can decide for ourselves based on what we see.

Another comment says this: "One could actually describe the film as the 1970s' answer to William Wyler's The Best Years of Our Lives (1946). " That's an excellent point. Nothing was said in "Best Years" (one of my favorite movies) that was anti-war. In fact, there is a scene in that film where the lead characters get in a fist fight with a man who says the war was a mistake. But we still saw the aftermath, the horrible wounds inflicted, the PTSD that they called "shell shock" back then, the disruption in home life, the difficulty resuming life at home. The film manages to tell the truth about war (up to a point) without being "anti-war".

Fonda's character does not become politicized. She wakes up to a certain extent but never takes a side on the issue. She supports her husband and hurts when he hurts. She supports Voight's character and hurts when he hurts. She's compassionate with the soldiers she encounters at her job. She never comments on whether Viet Nam was right or wrong. She only reacts to the pain she sees around her. Taking off her bra and letting her hair curl again, dressing like a hippy, aren't political statements about war. That was just the end of the 50's/early 60's mentality she'd been living under.Dern's character doesn't have a lot of screen time but what he does have is riveting. He's tormented. He has no opinion about whether "the" war is right or wrong, only that "war" is awful.

People can say what they want about Fonda, but she plays this one pretty close to the vest. Her character never says "Gee, we shouldn't have gone to Viet Nam." She reacts with compassion, not judgment or recrimination.I don't necessarily like Fonda in most films, but her turn in this one is excellent. Voight and Dern are likewise excellent, making us feel the confusion, anger and pain of their characters.A classic movie that everyone should see.

*

Don't make em like before.
9/10
Author: puntball from United States
24 November 2008

Man, I watched this with no idea of what is was about, but I liked the directors other films, I was blown away by this films subtle power. A film like this would not be made today. The 70's was such a great time for film-making. The "risks" that were taken or at least it would be deemed as such in the film climate we are in today. The performances in this film were spectacular, the directing top notch, the pace beautiful and the ending was a punch in the gut to those who want definitive answers. Iloved it. We don't see this nowadays and regretfully probably never will again. At least we can enjoy these masterpieces today and compare to some of the drab nonsense that is produced nowadays. Don't get me wrong there is some great stuff being produced today as well, but you will not see anything as raw and unadulterated as the 70's gem.

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p17

18/03/2015 15:52 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p17

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p17

    18/03/2015 15:52 par tellurikwaves

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p16

18/03/2015 05:47 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p16

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p16

    18/03/2015 05:47 par tellurikwaves

WERETALKINBOUTMOVIES
Critique de Jay Santiago

Less painful to watch, but equally engaging is Hal Ashby’s paraplegic love story Coming Home. Jane Fonda’s pet project was a by-product of her own commitment to the antiwar movement, and was inspired by her friendship with paraplegic ‘Nam veteran Ron Kovic (who Tom Cruise would go on to portray in Born on the Fourth of July). Where The Deer Hunter succeeds with grandiose production value, this film strikes a chord with its intimate exposition while still avoiding being overly sentimental. Yes, by all accounts, this is a romantic drama, but thanks to a restrained yet earnest screenplay that survived a handful of writers and several drafts (that sometimes were still worked on while filming was taking place with its leads Fonda and Voight pitching in lines of dialogue as well), it is a story that bears witnessing for its sincerity amidst brevity.

It triumphantly scored a Best Original Screenplay Oscar thanks to this collective effort. Fonda and Voight also deservedly took home the Lead Acting Oscars that year as well for their brave portrayal of two individuals who were searching for meaning in their disparate lives, and somehow wound up on the same page, both physically and spiritually. To say that theirs was just an emotional connection wouldn’t do justice to their performances. Their quest for meaning in a seemingly meaningless war during a confusing period in both their individual lives and in America’s as a whole, is nothing short of spellbinding. It takes an exceptional level of restraint, and an understanding of how life-changing the experience of another person’s struggles are to really effectively present a love story that goes beyond the usual trappings of romance. It is in this aspect that Coming Home truly shines: it is dressed up as an unlikely love affair set in one of the many VA hospitals that were inundated with injured veterans during the Vietnam War, but it is really a meditation on the search for redemption after the ravages of battle.

It’s hard to choose which film approached the war more effectively since both pictures paint an important portrait of this stirring time in American history. The Deer Hunter, despite its detractors, is still one of the most talked-about pieces of 1978, and I have to admit that to this day, its stark depiction of the horrors of war (however allegedly inaccurate) still made my skin crawl. And that’s what some of the best war films do; remind us of the atrocities of war to stir a sense of questioning in their necessity or validity. Coming Home, which I saw for the first time this year, was a genuine surprise. Its sensitive handling of the subject matter was punctuated by Fonda’s (and the rest of the team that she assembled through her own production company) obvious opposition towards America’s involvement in Vietnam. In a way, it seemed like the smarter way to get their agenda across, respectfully keeping their distance from onscreen depictions of the very conflict they were protesting, and bringing focus to the fact that the biggest battles are fought long after surviving soldiers are done evading gunfire.

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p15

17/03/2015 09:25 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p15

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p15

    17/03/2015 09:25 par tellurikwaves

Critique publiée par HenriMesquidaJr le 5 décembre 2014
Si les films traitant de la Guerre du Vietnam furent nombreux et se concentraient souvent sur les combats et les notions d'héroïsme et de lâcheté,"Le Retour"(1978)fut l'un des rares à conter en profondeur le parcours de personnages restés ou de retour en Amérique. Le film de Hal Ashby est donc un mélange de drame de guerre et de mélo sentimental. L'alchimie entre ces deux genres a priori opposés,n'est aisé à trouver,mais Ashby y parvient grâce à son humanisme débordant et son esprit de contre-culture teinté d'humour noir. Sur ce plan,il était donc parfaitement en phase avec Jane Fonda,à l'origine du projet et pacifiste convaincue.

Son interprétation déchirante d'une femme délaissée qui tombe amoureuse d'un paraplégique ombrageux dans l'hôpital où elle travaille bénévolement,lui valut avec justesse l'Oscar de la meilleure actrice.Oscar également remporté par Jon Voight puissant dans la peau d'un ex-soldat qui se relève pas à pas de son traumatisme physique et de sa noirceur mentale. le triangle amoureux est complété par Bruce Dern,marqué au fer rouge par les horreurs vécues. Ashby dénonce avec véhémence le mépris pour les soldats qui ont servi leur pays dans une guerre inutile. Malgré le sujet,le film ne tombe pas dans le mélo mais reste très fort. Une oeuvre à faire connaître.

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p14

17/03/2015 09:22 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p14

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p14

    17/03/2015 09:22 par tellurikwaves

©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p13

17/03/2015 09:18 par tellurikwaves

  • ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978)  p13

    ©-DR-LE RETOUR d'Hal Ashby (1978) p13

    17/03/2015 09:18 par tellurikwaves

SENS CRITIQUE

 


Critique publiée par Bunk_McNulty le 12 janvier 2014
Ashby dans toute sa splendeur qui traite un sujet qui lui sied tellement. Lui le défenseur des misfits de la société. Coming home a le mérite d'avoir une place à part dans toute la filmothèque vaste et complète traitant de la guerre du Vietnam. Les laissés pour compte, ceux qui reviennent brisés de la guerre, que ce soit physiquement ou psychologiquement, la société ne daignant pas les regarder. On les empile dans des hôpitaux inadaptés pour accueillir, on les soigne à qui mieux mieux et on leur tourne le dos.

Je reconnais que le réalisateur s'en sort vraiment bien, servi par un casting affuté comme jamais. Le duo Jane Fonda - Jon Voight épousant à merveille les contours de cette histoire poignante. Quelques scènes sont remarquables. Notamment à la fin celle où on voit tout un contingent de Marines qui revient de guerre, sur le tarmac de l'aéroport où se mêlent les blessés, les bras cassés, les alités et les cercueils. Le tout sous un soleil éclatant.

C'est l'intérêt du film, la violence n'est pas apparente, il n'y a pas de scènes de combat. Rien de tout ça.Tout est vu du sol américain, avec un détachement et une pudeur honteuse.Le désarroi et l'abandon de ces héros revenus d'une guerre insensée. Le tout accompagné d'une BO certes très efficace avec des standards des Stones et Beatles mais un poil encombrante, le seul défaut majeur du film à mon goût. Le silence était de circonstance souvent mais Ashby a dû avoir peur de laisser ainsi.Dommage.